Showing posts with label the strokes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the strokes. Show all posts

Sunday, April 12, 2015

Daily Album Digest: March 29 - April 11, 2015

Carrying on February's Music Writer's Exercise (#MWE), each day I listen to a new album and tweet a brief review of it. Then every two weeks compile those tweets here with some extra thoughts.




3/29: Big Giant Circles' The Glory Days: Proof that chiptunes don't need nostalgia value to be affecting and awesome.
Why? A recommendation from LoadingReadyRun’s Best of 2014 podcast(s).
Anything else? In case you don’t know, “chiptunes” are a form of electronic synth music. Also called 8-bit music due to its close association with (or attempt to recreate) old school video game soundtracks. To further drive this association home, Big Giant Circles an album called Imposter Nostalgia, which The Glory Days is a sort of sequel to (the album was Kickstarted with the subtitle Imposter Nostalgia 2.) Since I grew up with that era of video games, I do have a fondness for chiptune scores, which might make me more receptive to this album. However, I don’t think one necessarily needs that background to appreciate it. For one thing, while the songs have chiptune sounds they are very full and complex. It’s a lone melody like old game music. It’s almost orchestrating big arrangements with chip sounds. Each track is so distinct and the album covers so many emotions and moods. It can be very tense and exciting one track and very somber and beautiful the next (like “A Rose in a Field”.) I definitely think it’s worth checking out.

3/30: Sparks' Balls: Who knew a song called "How To Get Your Ass Kicked" could be sung so sweetly?
Why? Still plowing through Sparks in preparation for FFS.
Anything else? One of the downsides to the size of Sparks’ catalog is that some albums will eventually get lost in the shuffle and not always due to any of their own shortcomings. Case in point, this album happens to come after the one-two punch of Gratuitous Sax & Senseless Violins and Plagiarism and before the one-two of Lil’ Beethoven and Hello Young Lovers.  It’s almost a given that this will be overshadowed, but it has plenty of its own charm, such as the aforementioned “"How To Get Your Ass Kicked" and the drama of tracks like “The Calm Before the Storm” and “Scheherazade.”

3/31: Ringo Starr's Postcards From Paradise: Feels like friends getting together and jamming just for the fun of it.
Why? New release and it’s Ringo, so why not?
Anything else? I can’t necessarily see this converting anyone into a fan, but it’s a solid record. Ringo has well passed the point where he has to make music or, well, do anything really. It’s definitely made by people who want to make music and want to do it with each other.  I can always admire Ringo’s positive outlook, which comes through. And yet despite that (or maybe due to it) some of the most memorable moments are the more somber ones, like “You Bring the Party Down” and “Right Side of the Road.”

4/1: Sparks' Lil' Beethoven: The almost Python-esque absurdity of "Suburban Homeboy" is nothing short of magical.
Why? Still plowing through Sparks in preparation for FFS.
Anything else? Before anything else it must be said, this is not entry level Sparks. Even for Sparks this album is strange and I would not suggest most people wanting to get into the band start here. That isn’t a mark against it, it’s just not as accessible as some of their other work. After multiple albums of techno and synthpop, Beethoven’s heavy reliance on classical sounds (though not totally unprecedented in their work) feels like welcomed whiplash. And while the classical aspect could be alienating to some listeners, the lyrical content is what takes the album into avant garde territory. Much of album is built on constant repetition of minimal lyrics; the title of “My Baby’s Taking Me Home” repeats over a hundred times and opener “The Rhythm Thief” consists of a handful of lines that layer over each other. In any other hands it would be tedious or lazy, yet as AllMusic suggests “the mantras themselves become a pulse of sorts” in place of more traditionally achieved grooves and beats. Lyric-as-beat is quite an ambitious idea and I think it works for them.

4/2: Sparks' Hello Young Lovers: To call it a "rock opera" seems an oversimplification. It's fearless genius in action.
Why? Still plowing through Sparks in preparation for FFS.
Anything else? This album felt like Sparks took Lil’ Beethoven and mashed it with the glam rock of Kimono My House and Propaganda and then blew it all up as big as it could get. Generally, I’m not a fan of when people describe a piece of music “rewarding.”  It reeks of gatekeeping and almost makes the piece sound like a hazing or endurance test that reflects badly on one if they failed. Though I suppose it has a more positive connotation than calling a piece “difficult” or something similar. That said, I would probably put Hello Young Lovers in such a category, because it felt like getting chased by a runaway train. It’s an album that can take a lot out of you and much of it isn’t an easy or necessarily pleasant listen. For instance, the repetition of Lil’ Beethoven carries over onto this record, but instead of it serving as lyrics-as-beat it makes the songs’ narrators sound increasingly unhinged as the accompaniment builds in drama and hard rock ferocity (see “Dick Around” and “The Very Next Fight.”) Still, amid the craziness there are moments of fun (like “(Baby, Baby) Can I Invade Your Country”) and beauty (such as “Waterproof” which is one of the loveliest songs about a total asshole since John Lennon’s “Jealous Guy.”) Sparks themselves don’t like variations on the term “rock opera” used in regard to their work, which I empathize and agree with. Unfortunately, that’s the only term to even begin to describe and contextualize what they’re doing, though it can’t fully encapsulate it.

4/3: Ben Frost's Aurora: One listen doesn't feel enough to grasp all that goes on in this tense, menacing electronica.
Why? A recommendation from LoadingReadyRun’s Best of 2014 podcast(s).
Anything else? I’ll confess I’m not really sure how to write about this album. I get the chiptunes that Big Giant Circles works in, so I have a way into the work. Along with electronica, this album is labeled as industrial and noise, two genres that I don’t think I have the vocabulary to do justice to at present (especially the latter.) That’s just a shortcoming on my part, though. The album itself is interesting, intricate, and well-constructed. When I first started hearing “noise” used as a genre I figured it would be something that isn’t for me (given the connotations of the word), but this album makes me rethink that stance. I’m curious and willing to give it a shot now. Even if it takes some time for me to verbalize it properly.

4/4: ABC's The Lexicon of Love: The band succeeds in their desire to be "danceable, memorable, intelligent."
Why? A blog I follow put this on a recent list of recommendations.
Anything else? What stunned me most about this was how many Greatest of the 80s/All-Time lists it’s been included in. Not because the album is bad by any means (it’s damn good), but because I don’t recall ever noticing this album on such lists before. Of course that’s probably due to most “All-Time” lists I’ve seen being US based and 60s heavy. Or it got lost in the shuffle because I didn’t recognize the name. Either way, I’m glad it eventually found me, because it positively sparkles. 

4/5: Sparks' Exotic Creatures of the Deep: Maybe more accessible than the previous two albums, but doesn't click fully.
Why? Still plowing through Sparks in preparation for FFS.
Anything else? I’m not thrilled with the tweet for this album. “Accessible” was the wrong word to use. As strange as they can be, Sparks have a pop sensibility that makes them immediate and their ambition not alienating (with the perhaps exception of Lil’ Beethoven.) And they’ve explored so many genres, I do think most people could find a way into them. I think this album was easier, in a way, to take in because it didn’t have whiplash gear change of Lil’ Beethoven or the hard rock-classical explosion of Hello Young Lovers. Exotic Creatures occupies a similar vein, so the previous albums prepared me well enough. I feel like Exotic Creatures is to Hello Young Lovers what Propaganda was to Kimono My House in expanding and refining some of what preceded it. Also like those two albums, which one you like more may depend largely on which you heard first. There’s a lot of great stuff on this record; the humor of “Good Morning” (“I hope it's just your laugh that is infectious”), the swagger and stomp of “I Can't Believe That You Would Fall for All the Crap in This Song” and “(She Got Me) Pregnant,” and the divine harmonies of “Likeable” and “The Director Never Yelled ‘Cut.’” 

4/6: Foxes' Glorious: Some solid tracks like "White Coats" and "Echo." Great voice, but her enunciation can be muddled.
Why? This album’s been sitting in my Spotify queue since her feature on Fall Out Boy’s “Just One Yesterday” intrigued me.
Anything else? Though I stand by my tweet, I’m willing to give Foxes the benefit of the doubt and put some of the enunciation issue on lyric transcriptions possibly being messed up. Still. It was distracting at times.

4/7: All Time Low's Future Hearts: I don't really see the story said to be here, but it's some sincere pop-punk.
Why? New release and I don’t think I’ve ever heard their work before, so I thought I’d give it a go.
Anything else? According to ATL’s lead singer there’s a story being told on this record, but I didn’t pick up on it at all. If it does indeed contain a story, it’s not very overt about it, which can work. It’s often considered a strength for a work to unfold more with repetition. The songs themselves are fine overall. “Kids in the Dark” and “Dancing with a Wolf,” in particular, are quite good. I don’t mean this as any sort of knock against them, but it’s also quite apparent how much these guys have listened to Plain White T’s and Fall Out Boy. “Kids in the Dark” seems like it might be right at home on Save Rock & Roll.

4/8: Sparks' The Seduction of Ingmar Bergman: Gripping and moving. Some moments stand out, but it's definitely full piece.
Why? Still plowing through Sparks in preparation for FFS.
Anything else? The album is very much a musical that needs and deserves one’s full attention when listening. It’s funny; through a portion of it I didn’t think it was really grabbing me, until a Spotify commercial made me groan in frustration.  I was also surprised by how “Oh My God” and “Garbo Sings” gave me goosebumps. I wanted to enjoy this, but I still somehow ended up being surprised by how much it got to me.

4/9: Tears for Fears' Songs from the Big Chair: The songs have been so enduring a true "first impression" is difficult.
Why? It was in the queue.
Anything else? I realize I pretty much bailed when it came to that tweet, but I really didn’t anticipate literally half the album containing songs I already knew well. (Hopefully the rest of their discography will yield more genuine first impressions.) That said, in spots it felt jazzier than I expected and I love the trio of “Broken” and “Head Over Heels / Broken (Live).”

4/10: Phoenix' It's Never Been Like That: Exudes a joyful feeling that can only be described in silly spring metaphors.
Why? I’ve been meaning to check out their other albums since I really liked Wolfgang Amadeus Phoenix and this was in my queue.
Anything else? Yeah, the best way I can describe this album is that it sounds the way breathing in cool spring evening air feels. It’s a subtle joy, not the take-off-down-the-street-“Dog Days Are Over” style of happy, but a subtle joy that stop you in your tracks if you let it.

4/11: The Strokes' Room On Fire: Disappointing. The vocals mostly sound bored or like he's singing through a sore throat.
Why? In the queue and I wanted to get through more of their material.
Anything else? I remember really digging Is This It, so I was disappointed by this one. Although, I’m not too surprised, since I have read critics say the Strokes are an example in diminishing returns. I’m not ready to count them out, though, or even this record. It could very well be that I just wasn’t in the right frame of mind to get into it. Musically I can dig a lot of it, but the vocals often kill any affection I could possibly muster. I don’t know if there’s some kind of effect on Casablancas’ voice or what, I just know that whatever is going on doesn’t work for me. But “Reptilia” still kicks ass. 

All albums available to stream on Spotify.

Sunday, March 15, 2015

Daily Album Digest: March 1 - 14, 2015

Carrying on February's Music Writer's Exercise (#MWE), each day I listen to a new album and tweet a brief review of it. Then every two weeks compile those tweets here with some extra thoughts.



3/1: The Killers' Battle Born: The title track and "Be Still" are great, but cramming it with aspiring anthems makes it fall flat.
Why? After liking Day & Age so much I decided to charge ahead to this album. It… didn’t work out well.
Anything else?  I’m not a fan of when the Killers get their Springsteen on, but it’s not really that aspect that tanks the record for me. It’s a matter of pacing. The standard edition of the album has twelve songs, only two of them don’t go into lighters-in-the-air anthem territory. After a while they just have no punch anymore. Not every song has to be or can be “Born to Run.” 

3/2: Janet Jackson's Damita Jo: Its best moments are the old school turns ("I Want You") or just plain fun ("Just a Little While.")
Why? I wanted to go the opposite of the Killers’ record and have been criminally behind on Janet.
Anything else? I doubt this will ever be among my favorite Janet records, but it has some great moments. As something of a junkie for the genre myself, “R&B Junkie” speaks to me. I love the old school vibe of that track and “I Want You.” Speaking of “I Want You,” I think that track and the other Kanye West collaborations (“Strawberry Bounce” and “My Baby”) are really good.  His verse on “My Baby” is another matter, but that’s to be expected from him. The Babyface produced  track “Thinkin’ Bout My Ex” is another highlight and quite moving.
As for the negatives, no matter how sexy the singing, no matter if it’s Janet Jackson whispering it breathily, there is nothing sexy about the word “moist.” Or “erect.” I have no problem with Janet (or any artist) exploring her sexuality, but tracks like “Moist” and “Warmth” prove there’s a limit, at least creatively. I wouldn’t go as far as someone from AllMusic and call it embarrassing, just say that there are diminishing returns in that area.

3/3: Purity Ring's another eternity: In a word: dreamy. Carries you through lovely and strange images, but not much sticks out after the fact.
Why? Tuesday release. I’ve seen the name around a lot recently and dove in.
Anything else? No. I didn’t really connect with this record and feel no great desire to go back.

3/4: Sparks' Whomp That Sucker: I'm partial to the song "Funny Face" if for no other reason than it reminds me of book "Invisible Monsters."
Why? Still working through Sparks’ discography.
Anything else? This album came after Terminal Jive and is more rock than that or No 1 In Heaven, but it’s a better rock record than Big Beat or Introducing Sparks probably due to it sounding more early 80s new wave than generic 70s rock.

3/5: The Strokes' Is This It: Seminal works can be difficult to discuss, but alt. rock of the 2000s owes this album a debt and for good reason.
Why? I was originally going to listen to Room On Fire, but decided on this instead.
Anything else? As I said, it’s difficult to talk about albums like this one, because they have been so influential. I may not have ever heard this album in its entirety until recently, but I’ve still heard it because so much of rock in the 2000s wouldn’t exist without it. That sort of status can sometimes work against an album, though since they inspired a lot of the 2000s rock that I like, I dig it. In fact, this album is such a big deal that it landed on the Rolling Stone 500 Greatest Albums of All-Time, so while I would like to dig deeper in this, it’ll have to wait.

3/6: Coheed & Cambria's The Afterman: Ascension/Descension: I hesitate to use this phrase, but really, this is a return to form. Magnificent.
Why? Why not?
Anything else? I held off from this double album for a long time, because I was not big on Year of the Black Rainbow (and parts of No World for Tomorrow, but mostly YotBR.) The band has always had a metal edge, but those records seemed to be carrying them even further into that direction and frankly, that just isn’t for me. However, The Afterman feels more somewhere in between Good Apollo Vol.1 and In Keeping Secrets of Silent Earth: 3 without feeling like they regressed. It’s eclectic, gave me chills, made me tear up, so I loved it. 

3/7: Ariana Grande's My Everything: Her sweet and lovely voice saves songs that otherwise would be just middle of the road pop/r&b.
Why? I really liked her Grammy performance last month and have had this album in the queue, so to speak.
Anything else? Twitter’s limitations strike again and force me into backhanded compliments. Given more room let me put it like this: the songs themselves are not that striking or impressive on their own, but Ariana has such a beautiful voice that I wanted to listen to anything attached to it. I just wish the songs had more personality and more of her. She has a writing credit on the title track and that’s one song that feels true and not just a character she’s donning for a song. Maybe in time she’ll become more involved in that area. Her voice is a joy to listen to, so I want her to stick around and hopefully grow.

3/8: fun.'s Aim & Ignite: Reminds me of Panic! At the Disco's Pretty. Odd. in that both hit every right button to make me ridiculously happy.
Why? Another album that’s been sitting in my Spotify queue for ages.
Anything else? I liked Some Nights, in particular the introduction and title track. Something I really like about them is this drama and sense of scale that I don’t know the rest of that album lived up to. Aim & Ignite, however, completely revels in desires of Queen’s grandeur happily the whole way though. There have been critics who bemoan how much is going on musically and it certainly isn’t for everyone, but I can’t help bask in the strings and horns and harmonies. And Nate Ruess may not be Freddie Mercury, but when he sings, damn, I believe every word. Some current frontmen could really take a lesson from him. 

3/9: Janet Jackson's 20 Y.O. : Many blame this album's failings on Jermaine Dupri. That's unfair. The Jam/Lewis tracks don't fare well either.
Why? Playing catch-up with Janet.
Anything else? For anyone else this might be a decent or good album - not for Janet. I can cut her slack though. She has made some of the greatest dance/pop/r&b albums of all-time and frankly, not every album an artist makes is going to be great. It’s just not possible. That said, 20 Y.O. is still a letdown, because it’s the first Janet album that I disliked. “Call On Me” is sweet and breezy, but there’s not much here I feel the need to revisit. Even Damita Jo, which I was mostly lukewarm on, has more to offer. The Dupri-produced tracks feel messy and jumbled, while the Jam/Lewis-produced tracks wear out their welcome quick. Time could soften me this album, but as I said, I don’t feel a desire to go back to it anytime soon.

3/10: Laura Welsh's Soft Control: There's an edge to her captivating voice that recalls Annie Lennox. Highlights: "Ghosts" & "Break the Fall"
Why? The new releases that week were made up mainly of singles and Madonna’s Rebel Heart and I really didn’t want to touch that one.
Anything else? Along with having tones like Annie Lennox, the way she sings the word “cynical” in “Break the Fall” also reminds me of Fiona Apple. Anyone who can remind me of those two women possesses a voice that I can’t help but love. Unfortunately, though the album starts quite strong it starts to peter out about halfway through. The lyrics stay interesting throughout, but musically it blends together. Still, as I said about Ariana Grande, I enjoy her voice so much that I’ll take what I can get. I want to root for her and since this is only her debut I’m quite comfortable in doing so.

3/11: Janet Jackson’s Discipline: Tracks like opener “Feedback” and the evocative “Rock With U” make this the dance record 20 Y.O. wanted to be.
Why? I wanted to finish catching up with Janet.
Anything else? Apparently Jermaine Dupri made statements about 20 Y.O. being the most dance record Janet had done in a while. I don’t believe that to be the case. If you define a dance record as one that makes you dance, well, it didn’t make me want to dance. Discipline, however, does make me want to dance. The record also manages to give Janet a modern sound (such as on “Rock With U”), unlike 20 Y.O.’s clumsy attempts at contemporary r&b.
And yet, for all the goodwill Discipline builds with its dance tracks, the title track nearly throws it all out the window. Of course, Janet discussing sex is not new nor does the track represent her first foray into BDSM themes (see The Velvet Rope’s “Rope Burn”), but I find the track disturbing. Maybe I’m naïve or overreacting, but lyrics such as “Make me cry” and “Take out your frustrations on me” really, really rub me the wrong way. If nothing else, hundreds of thinkpieces on Fifty Shades of Grey prove the handling of BDSM in media is a murky area indeed. 

3/12: Dirty Pretty Things' Waterloo to Anywhere: With dark themes and rough but catchy sound ("Bang Bang You're Dead"), they were aptly named.
Why? It’s been sitting on my backburner for a long time.
Anything else? I’ve loved “Bang Bang You’re Dead” for a long time and was concerned that the rest might not live up to it. That concern was mostly unfounded. “Bang” still stands out the most sonically (mainly due to the inclusion of horns), but lyrically I was really struck by “Blood Thirsty Bastards” and “The Enemy.” The album’s not as rough as I recall (frontman Carl Barat’s previous band) the Libertines being, which works for me and makes it a more pleasant listen than they could sometimes be.

3/13: Box Codax' Hellabuster: How do I process an album full of grooves, that one minute reminds me of Oingo Boingo and 60s girl groups the next?
Why? Another that’s been on a backburner.
Anything else? That tweet was a play on recurring lyric, “How do I get your bullet out of my head” and also very much the truth. I’m still so flabbergasted by this record that I might end up writing a full post for it. But to be brief (for now): I know of this band because one of the members is Franz Ferdinand guitarist/keyboardist Nick McCarthy.  As with much of Franz, McCarthy composes the music of Box Codax  and what really struck me initially is how funky it gets at times. Trying to describe it is difficult for me, because something that vaguely reminds me Oingo Boingo and then throws out Motown strings by all accounts shouldn’t work. But it has so many great grooves that anchor it and it commits so hard to every seemingly mad musical idea that I can’t help but be on board. ...Even if it did break my brain.

3/14: Franz Ferdinand's Live at Roundhouse London: I likely won't discuss many live albums, but this "jolly bit of desolation" is the exception.
Why? Needed a break, so I cheated a bit.
Anything else? I try to steer clear of live albums or compilations for this daily album stuff. It feels a bit like cheating, because a greatest hits compilation doesn’t have the same purpose as a legit album. But, of course, if I’m going to make an exception for anyone it’ll be Franz Ferdinand. If nothing else Franz is a great live band and I really think anyone who doesn’t get a chance to see them should at least give this a listen. They have tremendous energy and when they hit their stride (“The Fallen” through “Auf Achse,” for instance) everything flows almost seamlessly.


All albums available to stream on Spotify. Except for Franz Ferdinand’s Live at Roundhouse London which is available here